| "Assault on Precinct 13" is one of the best movies ever
made. It's sad that it is one of John Carpenter's least favorite.
Although he is featured on this site elsewhere, i do not want to suggest
that he is a worthy director. Most of his movies are terrible. He
just happened to score big with "Assault on Precinct 13"
and then later with "They Live".
.......
Regardless
of Carpenter's views on art and entertainment, "Assault on Precinct
13" stands tall as a tremendous work for these three imperative
reasons:
1.
The Characters
2.
A Truly Negative Portrayal of Gangs
3.
Symbolism of the Struggle of the Individual
.......
1.
THE CHARACTERS
The main reason why "Assault on Precinct 13" stands far
above most other movies is because the three main characters are examples
of how men and women ought to be. Because i love these characters
so much, the majority of this review will be centered around their
splendor.
Bishop:
In "Assault on Precinct 13", the lead character is a black
man who is not racist, sassy, excessively hip, or immoral. It's a
amazing to see. Bishop was born into gangland, L.A. When growing up,
he decided himself to rise above the filth of his neighborhood. He
educated himself, worked hard, lived a straight-edged life, and eventually
became chief of the local police station. Throughout the movie he
is treated as an equal, not because he is black, but because he is
righteous. He has earned his respect. Bishop is a great leader because
he makes the decisions that nobody else wants to, and he makes them
with a rational mind. He thinks before acting. He will not give up
under any circumstances. Bishop always does what is right. Characters
like him just don't exist in today's cinema...especially if they are
black.
The
existence of Bishop in this 1976 film disproves any popular notion
that we are LESS-RACIST today than we were even ten years ago. The
fact is that there was far less racism yesterday or 30 years ago than
today. Our media-driven establishment has increased racism in America
and elsewhere. Until black men choose to portray themselves as real
heroes like Bishop, they will forever be regarded as his opposite.
And i will not accept the excuse that all movies are fronted by racist
white males. It has never been cheaper or easier to make movies today.
And there are several wealthy black film makers out there today who
continue to give us the worst possible role models to idolize.
Leigh:
Can
you imagine a woman who pleasantly serves her male counterparts coffee,
then picks up a gun to blast away worthless zombie gang members? I
never would have thought i'd fall in love with a girl holding a gun
until i saw Leigh in "Assault on Precinct 13". She is the
perfect model of a strong woman. Just like Bishop, she is righteous
and moral. She doesn't live to overturn a supposedly male dominated
society. She lives to be the best person she can be. She admires Bishop
as a leader and is pleased to have the opportunity to serve him. It
is obvious by her interactions with the other characters that Leigh
is an educated woman. Why then would an educated woman choose to work
as a secretary in a police station rather than join the ACLU? Because
she loves men. Leigh is one of the sexiest characters i've ever seen
on screen because of her visual admiration towards the other main
characters and because of her loathing towards the gang members. If
i were making movies today, every heroine would be designed in Leigh's
image.
Wilson:
To many people, Wilson may appear as a just another sympathetic serial
killer. But if you watch "Assault on Precinct 13", you'll
see that the only time he is ever treated with sympathy is at the
very end where Bishop insists that he is not hand cuffed as they walk
out of the battle zone victoriously. He is only treated with sympathy
here because he has earned it. Compare this to one of today's movies
where the viewer is forced to understand and have compassion for those
who commit the most heinous acts of butchery and mutilation (both
physical and mental mutilation). And Wilson, above all other fictional
serial killers, deserves the most compassion because there are deep
subconscious reasons why, as a young boy, he killed so many people.
Any film maker today would have forced the viewer to dive into his
brain to identify with his pain. Carpenter (perhaps accidentally)
used appropriate restraint when dealing with Wilson's history. The
only way to know exactly why he chose the life of a serial killer
is to judge him based on what we are shown on screen of his life as
an adult. Thankfully, Carpenter provides us with enough information
to formulate an accurate measurement of Wilson's constitution. Therefore,
his past may be slightly hidden, but it is not kept secret from the
viewer. We are given the opportunity to look into his life ourselves,
if we choose to absorb the deeper aspects of this incredible film.
Because Wilson's depth is optional to the viewer, we are permitted
to formulate our own opinions on his character.
Why
then, did Wilson turn to a life of murder? Let's look at him as an
adult, as he is portrayed in the film:
- His only friends are those who have proven their worthiness to him.
- His only romantic loves are women such as Leigh.
- There are two things he'd never run away from: An innocent man in
need of help and the woman he loves.
- He is a stark individual, who will risk his life to fight an army
of conformist gang members.
- When given the opportunity to flee for his freedom (and abandon
the others), he chooses to stay and fight because he knows that he
has accepted his crimes and will await his inevitable punishment by
society.
- He, like the other two main characters, is intelligent, rational,
heroic, and volitional!
Being
that this is all we have to go on to judge Wilson's character, what
would cause him to murder the masses? Perhaps the same reasons why
Steven Mallory tried to murder Elsworth Toohey in the Ayn Rand novel,
"The Fountainhead". In this novel, Steven Mallory is the
struggling artist...not struggling to make his art good, but struggling
for his perfect art to be accepted in an irrational evil world. He
is driven to murder Elsworth Toohey because Toohey represents all
that is evil in the world, a faceless beast with the desire to devour
magnificence in the name of social/spiritual/ethical welfare. Steven
Mallory can not stand to live in fear of subversive oppression. He
lashes out at Toohey because his art is the best of the best and Toohey
is the worst of the worst.
I
am not inferring that "Assault on Precinct 13"'s Wilson
is a struggling artist, but he was once a young person whose ideals
were threatened by the irrational world. Judging his life as an adult,
i can see no other non-contradictory explanation for his actions as
a child. Being that there are no contradictions to be found in "Assault
on Precinct 13", this is the only explanation possible. There
are so many reasons to love this movie, but perhaps none as exceptional
as the depth of Wilson's character.
.......
2.
A TRULY NEGATIVE PORTRAYAL OF GANGS
"Assault
on Precinct 13" shows gangs as what they really are: Mindless
hordes of the living dead, bent on spreading their disease to the
thinking minds of everyone around them. They live to infect the healthy.
They expect respect, but only at the point of a gun. They spread from
the shadows like cockroaches, acting collectively and selflessly for
their nest. This movie does not ask us to understand the gang members.
None of them have names. They hardly even speak, let alone act as
individuals. And what is most inspiring about the gangs in this movie
is how they attack the police station like zombies. They pour into
the building through windows, broken doors, etc... These scenes in
"Assault on Precinct 13" are visually identical to the best
zombi films. When the gang members are shot, they do not show signs
of pain. They just fall to the ground. Just like zombies, they do
not put up much of a struggle. They had no joy in life, so why should
they struggle to keep it?
No
other film has attacked gangs like "Assault on Precinct 13".
Today, gang members are often treated as equals to brain surgeons
and rocket scientists. It is refreshing to see a movie that condemns
them for what they really are: Mindless parasitic scumbags.
.......
3.
THE STRUGGLE OF THE INDIVDUAL
Throughout "Assault on Precinct 13", the three main characters
do their best to defend their police station from the zombi gang members.
As strong and intelligent as they are, the zombies far outnumber them.
Eventually the three heroes are driven to the basement of the building
(symbolic of today's "underground") and into a corner where
they make their final stand.
This
whole sequence is symbolic of the struggle of the individual versus
today's apparent mob rules mentality.
The
heroes manage to defeat the zombies with a combination of brains and
brawn. Using their wits, they find a way to destroy the horde, and
live to enjoy themselves another day.
.......
"Assault
on Precinct 13" is a must-see for anyone who believes that popular
movies are an inappropriate medium to express beneficial philosophy.
Using the word "popular" is a bit of a stretch, but this
film does have a pretty faithful following. It was never a blockbuster,
but may people enjoy it. In fact, there is a re-make in the works
for a 2005 release. Let's hope we are not disappointed. The bottom
line is this:
It
IS possible to make a righteous AND entertaining movie. "Assault
on Precinct 13" is proof. |